Somaliland: the electoral law for upcoming parliamentary elections imperils inclusive representation

Article

The absence of legal commitments and special arrangements to promote the representation of women, minorities, and clans from Somaliland’s contested regions in the upcoming parliamentary election will reinforce an exclusionary majoritarian voting system. This will clearly produce segments of winners and losers and, ultimately, will lead to less inclusive representation.

Reading time: 11 minutes

30 years after declaring independence from Somalia in 1991, Somaliland can take pride in an impressive but not flawless democratisation record. Since 2002, the people of Somaliland have participated in six multi-party elections: Three presidential elections (2003, 2010 and 2017) and two district council elections (2002 and 2012), but only one for Parliament (2005), and none for the House of Elders (Guurti). At last, combined local council and parliamentary elections will take place on 31 May 2021, four years and eleven years after they were due, respectively.

The repeated postponements of elections have at times caused political tensions and uncertainty. This has undermined Somaliland’s democratization process, weakened public confidence in democracy, stalled institution building and reforms, and damaged the country's relationship with the international community.

The main obstacle to holding parliamentary elections has been reaching a political compromise on allocating the 82 seats in the House of Representatives to Somaliland’s regions – and by extension, their clans - without a reliable national census.  The 2005 parliamentary election could only take place because the National Electoral Commission (NEC) brokered a temporary compromise on seat distribution just weeks before the polls.

However, the five-year mandate of the House of Representatives came to an end in 2010 without a reliable national census having been carried out, or a political solution put in place to resolve the issue of seat distribution. Disagreement on this issue delayed the holding of parliamentary elections for the next 10 years. Whenever the issue was raised, the only solution proposed was to return to the 2005 compromise formula. However, this has elicited strong opposition from people in Awdal region (Western Somaliland), particularly from the Samaroon clan, who felt the 2005 arrangement did not allocate them enough seats. Leaders from the clan threatened to boycott any polls without a revised seat allocation formula.

The national clan arithmetic and balance is at the centre of this stand-off. Expectations in Awdal region were anchored in a demand to allocate half of the seats of the House of Representatives to non-Isaaq clans (including Samaron, Isse, Harti). The argument was based on an intention to protect minority rights against majority rule and promote equitable clan representation rather than representation based on population. Particularly among leaders of the populous Isaaq clans, the proposal was perceived as unreasonable and provocative. It was also seen as an attempt to win the sympathy of other non-Isaaq clans, such as the Harti, to the Samaron cause.

Given the overwhelming public support in Awdal for stronger representation, and the fear of alienating other non-Isaaq constituencies, Somaliland’s political leaders refrained from addressing this divisive issue, contributing to the continual postponement of Somaliland’s parliamentary elections. But growing internal and external pressure forced President Musa Bihi to act.  In September 2020, he endorsed a new electoral law, which stipulated that parliamentary seats would be distributed according to the 2005 arrangement again. The law was passed in early October, despite strong opposition from MPs and elders in Awdal region, paving the way for the NEC to prepare parliamentary elections.

Women’s candidacy and representation

The change in 2002 from the clan-based system of representation to electoral democracy with universal suffrage gave women in Somaliland the right to stand for election and to vote. There was hope among women that recognition of their political rights would improve women’s participation and representation in Somaliland’s politics compared with the clan-based system of nominations, which discriminated against women. 

However, the first test of the new system —local council elections held in 2002— showed that formal recognition of the political rights of women was rarely respected in practice and was not enough to significantly improve their political participation. Clan influence remained extremely strong and most Somalilanders voted along clan lines, which tends to exclude women. The patriarchal clan system meant that very few women were put forward for election. In 2002, this resulted in only two women being elected among a total of 379 local councillors.[1]

Even when the law allows it, few women run for office in Somaliland. And women too generally vote along clan lines often under the direction of the men in their family. In the run-up to the parliamentary elections of 2005, women’s groups and other civic organizations campaigned hard to include provisions in the electoral law that would establish a quota for women candidates. However, the initiative was rejected by parliament. Once more, female candidates were largely excluded from the electoral process due to the strong clan influence in the nomination process and voting patterns. As a result, out of the 246 candidates in the parliamentary elections, only seven were women. Of the 82 MPs elected, only two were women.[2]

Efforts to amend the electoral law to set a quota for women continued. In 2007, constant pressure and lobbying from women’s groups and other civic organisations eventually persuaded the government and parliament to include provisions in the electoral law that would grant a  quota for female candidates. But, alhough the proposal was endorsed by the House of Representatives, it was rejected by the House of Elders due to opposition from religious groups. The proposal was put to a vote again in 2020, but both Houses rejected the amendments under external pressure.

In the absence of a quota or a framework for promoting women's representation, female candidates for the upcoming parliamentary elections on 31 May 2021 have sought support and endorsement from their respective clans. Seven women reportedly pursued the backing of their clans. Only one of them won the full support of her clansmen, setting a precedent as was the first time in Somaliland’s history that clan elders, intellectuals, the diaspora, youth, opinion makers, and businessmen publicly endorsed a woman's candidacy. Securing her clan backing furthered her candidacy. Resources were mobilised and a database was established to support her and to ensure the maximum registration of her clan constituency during the voter registration exercise. In contrast, another female candidate, who failed to secure the support of her clansmen, has faced strong and consistent resistance and opposition from her clan leadership and politicians.

Marginalised communities

2017 Presidential Elections in Hargeissa - Image by Ulf Terlinden

The most marginalised groups in Somaliland are the Gabooye, who constitute the traditional occupational castes (“low caste”) known as Tumaal, Midgaan and Yibir.[3]  For the Gabooye, the challenge of representation is more a question of their social status rather than their numbers. They have a significant number of voters in Hargeisa and urban centres to pick up seats. But their internal divisions and especially the lack of political, social, and economic clout as a result of many years of marginalization hinders the nomination and electoral success of Gabooye candidates. To rectify this, Gabooye representation was also discussed as part of the failed attempts to establish quotas.

In the absence of quotas, the Gabooye now compete with candidates from the “noble” sub-clans of Somaliland, both to get nominated by the parties and to win seats in the parliamentary and local elections. Local observers believe that at least one Gabooye candidate in Hargeisa[4] has a good chance of winning a parliamentary seat, because he is a prominent and outspoken member of a political party and enjoys public support.

The Harti candidacy and representation

Voters casting their votes in the 2017 presidential elections in Hargeisa

In the eastern regions of Sool, Sanaag and Togdheer that are contested between Somaliland and Puntland, the Dhulbahante and Warsangeli clans, which are sub-clans of the Harti clan federation, which includes the Majerteen of Puntland, have long been divided in their attitudes towards Somaliland. In the run-up to the 2005 parliamentary elections , there were security concerns about holding elections in some of these contested areas. Exclusion of these territories from the poll would have reduced Harti representation in the new parliament. A provision was therefore made in the electoral law for 8 reserved, uncontested seats for these Harti sub-clans - 6 for the Dulbahante and 2 for the Warsangeli.

Despite this, Harti representation decreased from 14 to 10 as a result of the 2005 parliamentary election. Of these seats, 8 were from the uncontested list, while 2 were elected.  In contrast, the number of Samaroon seats from Awdal region increased from 10 to 13. Candidates from the Isaaq clans on the other hand won 57 seats, gaining 10 seats at the expense of the Harti and minority representation. Members from Isaaq clans now controlled 70 per cent of the House, up from 63 per cent before those polls.

Ensuring the active participation of the Harti clans in the upcoming parliamentary election remains a challenge. There was an understanding between some Harti MPs and the president that the provision granting uncontested seats for the non-voting areas of the Sool, Sanaag, and Togdheer regions would remain. However, the plan met strong opposition from some Isaaq MPs in these three regions, who hope to win these seats in an electoral contest. They pressured the government to back off and passionately lobbied other Isaaq MPs to vote against reserved seats for the Harti. All Samaroon parliamentarians, and most of the Harti MPs boycotted the parliamentary debate on the electoral law in protest against the proposed seat allocation. In the end, the law was narrowly approved by Isaaq MPs in parliament, and no seats were reserved for Harti constituencies.

Those opposed to the special arrangement argued that the Harti communities would organise themselves as a political group to register enough voters to compete successfully in the elections. This sentiment is shared by some members of the Harti, particularly those from the areas controlled by Somaliland, such as Sool region.  Efforts by the competing candidates from the Dulbahante clan in Sool, government officials from these areas and the political parties have all improved participation in the voter registration considerably. The Dulbahante districts now hold more than  57% of the registered voters in the region, thereby allowing Dulbahante candidates to win 6 or 7 of the 12 electoral seats if there is high voter turnout. By contrast, the Warsangeli candidates (mostly in Sanaag) were far less successful because a large section of the area is not under sufficient control of the Somaliland government. The two predominantly Warsangeli districts have registered about 10,000 voters only. Together with about 16,500 other voters in the capital district of Eiragabo, Warsangeli candidates stand a chance to win only 2 out of 12 electoral seats in Sanaag. The denial of the uncontested seats by parliament could inflict substantial damage on political representation in Somaliland if the Harti constituencies fail to gain sufficient numbers in the House.

Conclusion

The absence of legal commitments and special arrangements to promote the representation of women, minorities, and clans from Somaliland’s contested regions in the upcoming parliamentary election will reinforce an exclusionary majoritarian voting system. This will clearly produce segments of winners and losers and, ultimately, will lead to less inclusive representation.

The most obvious losers will be women. Already, few women are running for parliament due to the prevailing social barriers. At best, women are likely to have only one representative in parliament. This will mean that women continue to be denied equal legislative rights, which will also have a negative impact on public policy. 

The Harti representation in parliament could reduce further after the upcoming election, thereby increasing their sense of marginalization within Somaliland.  It is also foreseeable that Isaaq clans will increase their share of seats at the expense of the Harti, while the Samaroon representation will probably remain unchanged, thereby increasing Isaaq dominance in the parliament and further cementing their majoritarian rule.

This article relies heavily on interviews and informal discussions with candidates and MPs from Awdal, Hargeisa, Sool, East Sanaag and West Sanaag conducted between 6 and 22 December 2020.

Author: Mohamed Ibrahim Gani[1]


[1] Mohamed Ibrahim Gani is a is freelance consultant and researcher who has written extensively on conflict, socio-economic needs, the judicial system, decentralisation, women’s rights, elections, civic education, youth, diaspora, institutional development and reconstruction in Somaliland over the past 25 years. He has held senior positions in the Somaliland Government and in civil society.


[1] ‘Democratisation in Somaliland’ in Adan Abokor et al eds.,  Further Steps to Democracy: The Somaliland Parliamentary Elections, September 2005, London: Progressio, January 2006, 10.

[2] ‘Democratisation in Somaliland’, 9.

[3] In casual speech, these groups are often referred to as Beelaha Gabooye, although members of the various sub-groups do not necessarily accept this appellation. For the purposes of brevity, the term Beelaha Gabooye is used to refer to the Gabooye, Tumaal, and Yibir together.